I think it is more effective in keeping the economy healthy
by using supply-side economy, because it focuses on stimulating production (supply) to increase
business output, create incentives for business investment, makes people work,
save, and invest more, and it also causes businesses to increase output. I
think it is good to invest into those businesses than people have more money.
Demand-side fiscal policy is a plan to stimulate aggregate demand, and
supply-side fiscal policy provides incentives to producers to increase
aggregate supply. Because supply-side fiscal policy provides the producers to
increase the aggregate supply in the economy, and use the money to build the infrastructures,
such as new highway road system, national parks, and other public services. Most
governments believe that improved supply-side performance is the key to
achieving sustained growth without causing a rise in inflation. Because the
supply-side fiscal policies can increase the productivity in the county, the
government can create more jobs for people to apply, which then encourages the
start-up and expansion of new businesses. There must also be a high enough
level of AD so that the productive capacity of an economy can actually be
brought into play. I think that supply-side fiscal policy is still best for the
economic growth.
Sunday, May 19, 2013
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Journal Topic 12: Role of the Government
I think that our government should keep their hands off our
country's economy, because some people believe that our government is very
corrupted. People that had paid taxes have complained about how they did not
see their money being used as the operating budget or the capital budget. I think would be the best for people to pay less
tax to the government, but pay back more to the producer company. Then government can collect more tax money
from the companies rather than directly charge huge amount of money on each
individual. I do not think that Federal
Reserve Bank should manipulate interest rates to try to achieve the same goals.
The goal of the government should keep people safe and defend the country
instead of helping the economy system. Our country should be like the United
States government, charging citizen taxes and also keeping them safe and having
Medicare programs that help people later o in their life. Although I think that, our government is
doing a great job in the national medical insurance programs, I still think
that government should keep their hands off the economy
Sunday, May 5, 2013
Journal Topic 11: Unemployment
I think jobs like doctors, lawyers, architects, and
designers are more resistant to unemployment. On the other hand, jobs like
electricians, convenient store cashiers, and cleaners are less resistant. Because professions like doctors, lawyers,
and architectures, they only have limited amount of people who study in them,
they are more unlikely to be unemployed and lose their jobs. For those who work
as electricians, convenient store cashiers, and cleaners, they only need some
knowledge to apply for the job, therefor, there can be easily substituted by
any other workers who have better knowledge and educational level. The difference
between those two categories of professions is that the former professions are
more educated and the latter professions are less educated. My potential career
could be an interior designer. I think
because there are so many people who work as designers, the job is less
resistant to unemployment. I do not think that there is any influence on why I
choose my future career. I think if have
more and better skills than some other interior designer, I will have less
chance to get unemployed by any other company. If I am good, enough this I can also be my own
boss, and work for myself instead of working for other companies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)